Build-Up Method

Surface Preparation

Surface preparation is the build up method that sits underneath every other one we deliver. It is the mechanical and chemical work that turns a contaminated, smooth or unsound substrate into a clean, profiled, fully bondable surface ready for a bund lining. Get it right and every later step performs as designed; get it wrong and even the best resin will debond, blister and fail well inside its design life.

Overview

How Surface Preparation Works

We treat surface preparation as the engineering operation it is, not a routine site task. Every step has a measurable outcome, and the whole sequence runs against the standard the chosen lining system requires. Our standard sequence is:

When Is This Required?

  • Substrate survey: the slab or wall checked for soundness, contamination, moisture, cracking and any old lining residue, setting the level of preparation it actually needs.
  • Containment and access: sheeting, screening and HEPA filtered extraction to contain dust and debris, with DSEAR compliant equipment where the work is in a hazardous zone.
  • Initial cleaning: degreasing, vacuuming and removing loose material, oil and debris before any abrasive work.
  • Mechanical preparation: the core step, using grit blasting, scabbling, diamond grinding, shot blasting or ultra high pressure water jetting to expose a sound, profiled substrate to the specified standard.
  • Detail preparation: opening cracks, racking out joints, exposing flanks and treating corners, penetrations and re-entrant details to the same standard as the field.
  • Decontamination: of any chemical, hydrocarbon or biological residue revealed during prep, especially where failure has let product saturate the substrate.
  • Final cleaning: full vacuum extraction of all dust, debris and abrasive arisings, leaving a clean, dry, contamination free surface.
  • Verification: measured checks of profile, cleanliness, moisture and temperature against the lining manufacturer’s specification, recorded for the project file.
  • Hand off to the lining team: primer applied within the manufacturer’s window before flash rust, carbonation or atmospheric contamination spoils the prepared surface.

Surface Preparation Types

Grit blasting (open nozzle): the standard method for new and refurbishment work where access and dust control allow it, using single use abrasives such as garnet or copper slag.
Shot blasting: recoverable steel shot in a self contained machine, for floors and large open areas where uniform profile and minimal dust matter.
Scabbling: pneumatic chipping that removes 1 to 10 mm of substrate, where heavy contamination, chemical attack or bonded failed lining must come off down to sound concrete.
Bush hammering: mechanical hammering, used selectively for profile correction on confined or vertical surfaces.
Captive (vacuum) blasting: grit blast with built in extraction, where dust control is critical (live plant, food production, occupied buildings) or DSEAR zoning rules out open nozzle work.
Diamond grinding: for surface levelling, laitance removal and profile correction where blasting is impractical, including small areas, edges and detail work.
Ultra high pressure (UHP) water jetting: typically 25,000 to 40,000 psi, removing BSA attacked concrete in sewers, water saturated coatings and contamination in food and pharmaceutical environments without dust.
Steel preparation to SA 2.5 or SA 3: the equivalent process on steel substrates, used on transformer plinths, steel shelled bunds and substation oil containment systems.
Chemical Bund Lining

Surface Preparation Performance and Profile

Surface preparation does not add thickness, it removes substrate to expose a profiled bonding surface. Performance is judged on measured profile depth, cleanliness and moisture rather than dry film thickness:

  • Light preparation: ICRI CSP 2–3, suitable for thin-film coating work where chemistry is moderate and surface profile is the primary requirement.
  • Standard preparation: ICRI CSP 3–5, the typical specification for most bund coating work in the UK across both new build and refurbishment.
  • Heavy preparation: ICRI CSP 5–7, used as the base for trowel-applied mortar systems and most reinforced lay-up work, with deeper mechanical profile to lock the build-up into the substrate.
  • Aggressive preparation: ICRI CSP 7–9, reserved for heavy-duty trowel mortars, structural rebuild and severely contaminated or chemically attacked substrates.

Steel preparation runs on a different scale. This is typically SA 2.5 (near-white metal) for protective coating work, with SA 3 (white metal) used for the most demanding immersion duty.

materials

Surface Preparation by Resin System

Surface preparation is the foundation for every resin in our range. It is not the lining material itself, but the prep regime is tailored to whatever is going on top. The expected pairing is:

Epoxy Resins

Typically applied over CSP 3–5 prep on concrete, with a documented penetrating primer matched to the chosen system.

Polyurethane Resins

Similar prep to epoxy, with additional moisture verification given PU's sensitivity to substrate water content.

Polyurea Resins

Usually require more aggressive prep (CSP 5–7) because of their rapid cure and limited substrate wetting time, with a primer specifically engineered for polyurea over-application.

Vinyl Ester Resins

Applied over heavy preparation (CSP 5–9), particularly where FRP/GRP lay-up work is being installed, with vinyl-ester-compatible priming.

Novolac Epoxy Resin

Heavy preparation followed by novolac primer, with strict attention to moisture and contamination given the demanding service novolac is normally specified for.

Advantages

Advantages of Surface Preparation

  • The biggest factor in lining performance: most failures across all sectors trace back to inadequate preparation, not material choice.
  • Mechanical lock: the profile turns chemical adhesion into a mechanical key, far more resistant to debonding under thermal, hydrostatic or chemical load.
  • Removes contamination: that would otherwise sit at the lining to substrate interface and cause blistering or osmotic failure.
  • Exposes hidden defects: that need fixing before the lining goes on, rather than burying them under a finished system.
  • Measurable outcomes: profile, cleanliness and moisture, all recordable and evidenced for the project file.
  • Lower whole life cost: extends the time between recoats and avoiding premature remediation.
  • Versatile: Works under every build up in our range, with the regime tuned to whatever follows.
Limitations

Surface Preparation Limitations

  • Generates dust, noise and debris: even captive blasting and water based methods need containment, extraction and waste management.
  • Deeper substrate damage: chemically attacked or structurally failed concrete must be removed and rebuilt before lining prep begins.
  • Live plant constraints: open nozzle blasting and scabbling are not viable in occupied or DSEAR zoned areas.
  • Moisture management: permanently saturated or below grade concrete may need active drying, a vapour barrier or a specialist primer rather than standard prep.
  • Tight steel windows: flash rust forms quickly after blasting, so priming follows on without delay.
  • Over removal risk: aggressive preparation on thin or weakened substrates can take out more material than intended.
Get Expert Lay-Up Advice

Need a lay-up specified for a demanding bund?

Speak to Reschem about the right laminate build-up, resin choice and inspection regime for aggressive chemical duty, confined structures or long-life containment assets.

Choosing

When to Choose Each Surface Preparation Method

Surface preparation is mandatory on every bund lining project; the question is which variant. Our typical decision criteria are:

Use Grit Blasting

When access, dust control and DSEAR zoning all allow open-nozzle work, including new build and refurbishment outdoors or in non-hazardous areas.

Use Captive (vacuum) Vlasting

When dust must be controlled. Live plant, food and pharmaceutical environments, ATEX-zoned areas and inside occupied buildings.

Use Shot Blasting

For floor work over large open areas where uniform profile and minimal mess matter, including warehouse and production hall bunds.

Use Diamond Grinding

For detail work, edge preparation, profile correction or where blasting is impractical, and as the standard for stained or laitance-only floors.

Use Scabbling

When 1–10 mm of substrate must be removed. Heavy contamination, chemical attack or a bonded failed lining that cannot be blasted off.

Use UHP Water Jetting

For BSA-attacked sewer concrete, water-saturated coatings, hygiene-led environments where dust is unacceptable, and confined spaces with poor ventilation.

Applications

Surface Preparation Applications and Industries

Surface preparation is delivered across every sector we work in, with the variant tailored to each environment:

Oil, Gas and Petrochemical

Grit blast and captive blast on tank bunds and tanker offload aprons, with hydrocarbon decontamination as part of the regime.

Power Generation and Transmission

Careful, dust-controlled preparation around live substations, including blasting of substation oil containment systems and steel transformer plinths to SA 2.5 or better.

Food & Beverage

Captive blasting and UHP water jetting for hygiene-led production floors, where open-nozzle dust is incompatible with operational areas.

Sewage and Waste Water Treatment

UHP water jetting on BSA-attacked concrete in sewers, wet wells and digester gas spaces.

Chemical Processing

Heavy preparation with chemical decontamination on contaminated substrates around dosing skids, drum decks and reaction floors.

Agriculture & Aquaculture

Shot blasting on slurry tanks, silage clamps and AD plant bunds, often after biofilm and product-residue removal.

Nuclear Facilities

Captive blasting and decontamination-aware preparation, with HEPA-filtered extraction and arisings managed as the appropriate radioactive waste category.

Prep

Surface Preparation Acceptance Criteria

  • Concrete profile measured against ICRI CSP 1–9, with the target value set by the lining manufacturer for the chosen system.
  • Steel profile measured against ISO 8503 comparators, typically targeting medium grade G profile for protective coating work.
  • Cleanliness verified against ISO 8501-1 (steel) or visual standards (concrete), with dust-on-surface checked against ISO 8502-3 quantity and size ratings.
  • Moisture content below the manufacturer's threshold, normally under 4% by weight on concrete, verified by hygrometer or calcium chloride test.
  • Substrate temperature within the resin's working envelope and at least 3°C above dew point, monitored across each working day.
  • Contamination removal — oils, salts and chemical residues all measured and removed before priming, including the chloride and sulphate testing required on steel for immersion duty.
  • Application window — primer applied within the manufacturer's stated time after preparation, before flash rust, carbonation or atmospheric contamination undoes the work.
QA

Surface Preparation Quality Assurance and Testing

  • Visual inspection against industry comparator panels for both concrete (ICRI CSP) and steel (ISO 8501-1).
  • Profile measurement using replica tape (Testex), profile gauges or calibrated comparators at representative points across the substrate.
  • Dust-on-surface testing to ISO 8502-3, particularly important after blasting where loose particulate would otherwise sit at the lining-substrate interface.
  • Moisture testing by hygrometer, calcium chloride or capacitance meter, recorded against the manufacturer's threshold.
  • Salt and contamination testing. Chloride and sulphate ion testing on steel, oil and grease tests on concrete where the substrate's history requires it.
  • Adhesion pull-off testing at the trial-coat or sample stage, confirming that the chosen primer-and-substrate combination meets the design value before full application.
Frequently Asked Questions

Surface Preparation FAQs

Inadequate preparation is the leading cause of lining failure across the industry, producing debonding, blistering, osmotic attack and premature loss of containment. The lining itself usually looks fine at handover; the failure shows up months or years later, at which point a full re-line is the only viable remedy.

Our Work

Featured Case Studies

View all projects
Get Independent Expert Advice

Get Independent Expert Advice

Speak to our technical specialists about your bund lining requirements. Free, no-obligation site surveys available nationwide.